Exclusive Content & Downloads from ASQ

Variance Dispersion Properties of Second-Order Response Surface Designs

Summary: Often, second-order response surface designs are chosen on the basis of a single-valued criterion such as D- or G-optimality. While such criteria provide a useful basis for selecting designs, they often fail to convey the true nature of the design's support of the fitted model in terms of prediction properties over a region of interest. As an alternative to a single-valued criterion, we propose variance dispersion graphs to compare various second-order response surface designs. This graphical procedure is used to examine the relative strengths and weaknesses of such popular designs as the central composite, Box-Behnken, and small composite. Areas in the region of interest where prediction is relatively good and relatively poor are discussed, and designs which have good overall performance are highlighted. A summary comparison of such saturates or near-saturates designs as the hybrid, Box-Draper, and Notz designs is given together with recommendations concerning the proper choice among these designs. Finally, we show how the use of the D-optimality criterion can lead to misleading results when the user is truly interested in response surface prediction.

Anyone with a subscription, including Site and Enterprise members, can access this article.

Other Ways to Access content:

Join ASQ

Join ASQ as a Full member. Enjoy all the ASQ member benefits including access to many online articles.

Subscribe to Journal of Quality Technology

Access this and ALL OTHER Journal of Quality Technology online articles. You'll also receive the print version by mail.

  • Topics:
  • Keywords: Design efficiencies,Response surface methodology (RSM),G-optimality,D-optimality
  • Author: Myers, Raymond; Vining, G. Geoffrey; Giovannitti-Jensen, Ann; Myers, Sharon
  • Journal: Journal of Quality Technology